Tuesday, June 30, 2009
How To Make Sidekick Internet Work Att Program
I, for one, found it absurd when that crazy said it was inspired only on the books of Jane Austen for their characters and the whole mood of romanticism. First, even if it is true many things disclosed by detractors or critics simply more daring - like you, hehe - Twilight Net over, then this woman did not understand the essence bulhufas " austeniana " or is finding hair in the egg, after all, the Elizabeth Bennet of Pride and Prejudice
is in no way a girl futile and only worried about being the ideal wife for their love / husband. Elizabeth Bennet is a real heroine, without idealization or Manichean fleeting, makes mistakes - including judgments, prejudices driven - acting for the reason most often - but EMOC ; OAS commotion also have space in your personality, obviously. As for selfishness, Liza there has his lapses, but nothing near what I've heard that Bella designed by Meyer.
And at least in the EPO have not seen any like this hero saint Edward Cullen, a vampire with no category (non-vampire vampire bites = no class), rs. In a way, albeit with a certain boldness and creativity in this new vampire design, Meyer shattered the image of leeches seductive, because it deprived him of his most visceral and ancient symbolism: the personifies ; the libido. And how can someone write something about vampires without having read at least the masterpiece maximum, master Dracula Bram Stoker, OMG! A catastrophe!
# 2
've written some critical middle Net scattered all around, about twilight, but never something that was the realm of conjecture and "told me that .. .. " Do not read any Harry Potter book yet, so do not feel entitled to criticize it in a way supposedly conclusive, coherent or compelling arguments. I'm a fan of HP - and therefore already I was prejudiced against by many people, most of them never even touched a volume in the series - I am an intelligent person and real critical thinking, and I know I should not love or hate what you do not thoroughly understands, as it was Leonardo Da Vinci, and this extends to criticisms that claim to be well founded. # 2
# 3 I know of men who liked the series, or at least the first book. (...) But the fact is that HP can mess with people of any age, gender and origin. Most fans today, for example, are adolescents and young adults - like me - they grew up following the series, and well know people mature in terms of age who love HP and have the same provision of a child to face a row of cinema debut, hehe.
# 4 Here's a pseudocrítica I posted on the blog of a colleague of mine about the series:
Well, speaking quickly, Twilight is a series that tells the story of a human girl who falls for a vampire, or a super-cliche, exploited, and patched excavating in Hollywood. But of course it is often impossible to avoid certain cliches, sometimes because they are so also in real life, others by the appeal and fascination that it contains. Twilight falls into this second sense. And what makes up an innovative way, after all, the vampire is not a bloodthirsty devilishly seductive, that sooner or later it bites the girl and become one of them, but a guy "chaste" and " ; pure, nice, lol, that respects the human condition and how it wants to be a different vampire - is more or less so? He is much closer to a romantic hero with touches of Jane Austen - although admittedly not so abusively that compare with Austen, a leading British writers, whose "heroes" were nothing saints - or even Joseph of Alencar. And the young woman, Bella, also has touches of Elizabeth Bennet in Pride and Prejudice, a masterpiece that I've had the honor of reading. However, even if they publish the figures, it is significant that, unfavorable opinions - and even to people more versed in Literature I - there are a lot of deceptive advertising or wrong about it. I am told, Elizabeth has little or nothing to do with Bella from Twilight, this one girl vain, selfish and somewhat submissive, could even refuse to live their love without the other side to make their concessions. That is, submissive girl, conceived in some spots. And I know that the work is steeped in Christian moral concepts: they do not have sex, do not indulge the flesh, by refusing to bite her, Edward was symbolically denying "deflower ; it, " and even his own sin, you know? Pacts are as virginity until marriage, lol, recalling that the novelist is a Mormon. The apple on the cover of the book, according to the author herself, represents the fruit of knowledge of good and evil, the desire to have this knowledge and wanton them to prove themselves this fruit - as in myth of Adam Eve, repression by both the sex and the knowledge of this and / or the rebellious religious - and not exactly sex. Implicitly, there is an indictment with sexual repression. And many say that the work is Manichean, lacks the depth of Harry Potter. And so I say to yourself, after all I am a fan, and I know the capacity of Jo - JK Rowling, the author of HP - to develop personal stories compelling and complex, and contradictory characters and even ambiguous, good and evil within the human being, a humanist conception. Many writers and critics say quite literally be higher HP to Twilight. Names like Stephen King and Ray Bradbury admire HP, and this first repudiated Twilight in a recent interview.
[2]
And another: VAMPIRE = SEX. The vampire is a personification of both our repressed desires (refers to blood and sex, the bite penetraçãoe refers to the violent side of sex, etc.) and our aspiration to immortality (immortality but one in which we are still connected to the body and we can satisfy our carnal desires, the contrast between the immortality of the divine character).
[2]
And another: VAMPIRE = SEX. The vampire is a personification of both our repressed desires (refers to blood and sex, the bite penetraçãoe refers to the violent side of sex, etc.) and our aspiration to immortality (immortality but one in which we are still connected to the body and we can satisfy our carnal desires, the contrast between the immortality of the divine character).
# 5 (...) Pride and Prejudice, a masterpiece of Jane Austen. Based on what I wrote up one of replica
on the relationship Elizabeth (OEP) / Bella (Twilight). You'll see how that Meyer has about 10 screws less, lol. The idea that being bitten by a vampire turns into a really old made more sense - after all it was the beginning of the spread of the myth, and carrying the leech population was smaller, lol. But now I can not remember for sure if this is so even in
Dracula, or if already Stoker was designed to processing only the vampire drinking the blood by the victim - and if I remember it well in some mythologies, after all there are different conceptions about vampires, depending on the coun s / region.
And that sparkle vampire is ridiculous, as people do not realize? Without protruding fangs, then, even worse (yet another castration semiotics ultimately leads to the bestial nature of the vampire and the phallus). And they say the explanation found by Meyer to explain Bella's pregnancy is the height of the ridiculous and insulting the intelligence.
on the relationship Elizabeth (OEP) / Bella (Twilight). You'll see how that Meyer has about 10 screws less, lol. The idea that being bitten by a vampire turns into a really old made more sense - after all it was the beginning of the spread of the myth, and carrying the leech population was smaller, lol. But now I can not remember for sure if this is so even in
Dracula, or if already Stoker was designed to processing only the vampire drinking the blood by the victim - and if I remember it well in some mythologies, after all there are different conceptions about vampires, depending on the coun s / region.
And that sparkle vampire is ridiculous, as people do not realize? Without protruding fangs, then, even worse (yet another castration semiotics ultimately leads to the bestial nature of the vampire and the phallus). And they say the explanation found by Meyer to explain Bella's pregnancy is the height of the ridiculous and insulting the intelligence.
# 6
wanted to complete my thought, with some thoughts I recorded yesterday. Tava even thinking of these transcribe my coments on my blog post about a vampire or something. The bite of the vampire, it inflicts both pain and pleasure to the victim, refers to the awakening of sexuality and loss of virginity, a phenomenon characterized by dichotomy sensory. Ecstasy reached, caused by the bite, is analogous to the release of the libido of our sexual desires - and built a load of violence, both libido and aggression are the Our primary strengths and viscerally connected - repressed. The vampire is sex, eroticism in all its power, the trigger of what is latent in the knowledge that is denied - which is dangerous and that apples acepçãoa ã that tops the cover of Twilight is a symbolism properly inserted, the "forbidden fruit" of knowledge - the sin, the quest for eternal youth and immortality who do not deprive us of earthly delights - as opposed to the divine - The distance - but not really a denial - of God through the call of flesh and communication with the diabolical. Note that the figure of the traditional vampire and archaic, so I would even explicit, there are a number of metaphors and symbols connected to religious thought, especially Christian, highly repressive. However, in those countries where flourished the conceptions of traditional vampire, immortalized by Stoker, the predominant religion was Christian (Catholic or Orthodox). It is the fear of the cross and other Christian symbols, the suicide who turns into a vampire, the leech as a being cursed by God himself, and so on, just to stay in more superficial.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment